Javascript är avstängt eller blockerat i din webbläsare. Detta kan leda till att vissa delar av vår webbplats inte fungerar som de ska. Sätt på javascript för optimal funktionalitet och utseende.

Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Malin Arvidson. Foto: Patrik Hekkala

Malin Arvidson

Universitetslektor | FD i sociologi

Malin Arvidson. Foto: Patrik Hekkala

Anpassning eller autonomi - utvärderingspraktik inom civilsamhällets organisationer

Författare

  • Stig Linde
  • Malin Arvidson
  • Roberto Scaramuzzino

Summary, in English

International studies on civil society organizations (CSOs) highlight how CSO's relation to the public sector is central to the characteristics of organizational change. This article contributes to this line of research in two ways. Firstly it explores how Swedish CSOs, involved with social services, are affected by proximity to and dependence on the public sector for their strategies of organizational evaluation. Based on a survey we investigate whether organizations' evaluation practices can be understood as the result of institutional pressure defined by a dominating public sector. The focus on evaluation practices is motivated by assumptions that evaluation principles based on public institutional logic, i.e. cost-effectiveness, evidence-based practice and competition, may threaten the integrity of organizations; by adapting evaluation standards defined by the public sector, particular characteristics and independence of CSOs are put at risks.
Secondly, the study contributes to scholarly debates concerning theoretical assumptions that resource dependence, contract-based and legislation-based coercive relations affect the evaluation strategies employed by CSOs. The analysis confirms the assumption that producing services in policy areas with legislation affects evaluation practice, but rejects assumptions that suggest similar influence based on resource dependence (except for regional funding) and contractual-based relations. The results lead us to examine how relations between CSOs and the public sector are ideally understood as encompassing both instrumental and intrinsic values. This knowledge is valuable for our understanding of the Swedish context. The fact that some of the study's assumptions are not supported, can be interpreted as an expression of a relationship between CSOs and the public sector that is characterized by mutual understanding, rather than power asymmetry that follows resource-dependency and contractual relationships. The study also contributes to scholarly debates on the impact of institutional pressure on CSOs, as it encourages a more detailed picture of the dimensions of institutional pressure as including historical as well as legislative and time-based contractual relationships.

Avdelning/ar

  • Socialhögskolan

Publiceringsår

2020-12-08

Språk

Svenska

Sidor

113-136

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift

Volym

27

Issue

2

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Forsa

Ämne

  • Social Work

Nyckelord

  • civila samhället
  • utvärdering
  • autonomi
  • idéburna organisationer med social inriktning
  • ideella organisationer
  • resursberoende

Status

Published

Projekt

  • Granskningssamhällets krav och civilsamhällets (re)aktioner

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1104-1420