Javascript är avstängt eller blockerat i din webbläsare. Detta kan leda till att vissa delar av vår webbplats inte fungerar som de ska. Sätt på javascript för optimal funktionalitet och utseende.

Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Roberto Scaramuzzino. Foto: Patrik Hekkala

Roberto Scaramuzzino

Docent | Postdoc | FD i socialt arbete

Roberto Scaramuzzino. Foto: Patrik Hekkala

Social movements and interest groups compared : How organisational type matters for explaining Swedish organisations’ advocacy strategies

Författare

  • Håkan Johansson
  • Roberto Scaramuzzino
  • Magnus Wennerhag

Summary, in English

The divide between interest groups and social movement studies runs deep, but present developments call for a renewed focus on the relevance of these analytical categories. Both of these two forms of collective action relate to organisations that are assumed to follow distinctive logics and strategies for political influence. This article aims to contribute to the debates on the analytical difference between interest groups and social movements by comparing their political strategies and addressing the relevance of the typology for explaining organisations’ use of political strat-egies. The paper draws on a dataset resulting from a large survey among Swedish civil society organisations among which clear cases of interest group organisations and “old” and “new” social movement organisations (SMOs) were identified. The results show that the distinction between interest groups and social movement organisations has some analytical value when it comes to explaining the use of different types of strategies: e.g. direct lobbying and media-based and protest-based strategies. Also, the distinction between old and new SMOs is shown to be relevant because old SMOs seem to be in a way “in between” interest groups and new SMOs suggesting that social movements tend to develop over time and to become more similar to interest groups.

Avdelning/ar

  • Socialhögskolan

Publiceringsår

2019-10-05

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

353-381

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Partecipazione & Conflitto - The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies

Volym

12

Issue

2

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Editoria Scientifica Elettronica - ESE

Ämne

  • Social Work

Nyckelord

  • advocacy strategies
  • Civil society organisations
  • Interest Groups
  • Organisational types
  • Social movements
  • Sweden

Status

Published

Projekt

  • Beyond the welfare state: Europeanization of Swedish civil society organizations (EUROCIV)

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 2035-6609