Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Malin Arvidson. Photo: Patrik Hekkala

Malin Arvidson

Senior lecturer

Malin Arvidson. Photo: Patrik Hekkala

Control and autonomy: resource dependence relations and non-profit organizations


  • Malin Arvidson
  • Stig Linde

Summary, in English

Purpose – For non-profit organizations (NPOs) external funding is an essential resource. Studies highlight how control is attributed to funders and so external funding threatens the autonomy of the recipient organization. The purpose of this study is to investigate how external control can be structured and exercised,
and to explore how control interacts with organizational autonomy.
Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on interviews and participant observations with NPOs and their funders over a period of time. It reports from four different funding-relations: contract-based,
social investment, gift-funded and civil society–public partnership. The concept of organizational discretion is used to analyse how control and autonomy are interconnected in these relationship.
Findings – The analysis illustrates the value in exposing the different discretionary boundaries related to external control and how control can become a sparring partner in the organization’s striving for autonomy.
A concluding argument is that control and autonomy are each other’s companions rather than antagonists. The study leads us to question a general assumption that NPOs strive to avoid resource dependence and
external control but instead may use such control to develop strategies for independence and self-realization.
Originality/value – The empirical material is unique as it includes voices of recipient organizations and funders, and offers a comparison of different controlling-relations. The study presents an innovative analytical
framework based on the concepts of discretionary space and reasoning, which supports a critical discussion regarding the idea of external control as detrimental to the autonomy of NPOs.


  • School of Social Work

Publishing year





Journal of Organizational Ethnography

Document type

Journal article


Emerald Group Publishing Limited


  • Social Work
  • Sociology


  • Control
  • Resource dependence
  • Autonomy
  • Nonprofit organizations
  • Accountability
  • Nonprofit organizations
  • Autonomy
  • Control
  • Accountability
  • Resource dependence




  • Granskningssamhällets krav och civilsamhällets (re)aktioner


  • ISSN: 2046-6749